Exploring Corporal Punishment Laws

Review Article

Abstract

When physical force is employed to discipline or penalize an individual, such as through spanking or paddling, it is termed as corporal punishment, typically involving children. Opinions vary widely regarding the effectiveness and ethical implications of this controversial practice. Advocates of mild corporal punishment argue that it can enhance a child's well-being and deter misbehavior, while critics contend that it is a time-consuming and ineffective means of behavior correction. The American Academy of Pediatrics, among other child development organizations and experts, promotes positive disciplinary approaches emphasizing understanding, communication, and guidance over physical punishment. The historical relationship between physical punishment and criminal behavior has been scrutinized, with traditional customs often maintaining a loose semblance of discipline and order in ancient societies. As societal perspectives have evolved, human rights are more widely recognized, leading to a shift away from severe physical punishment, particularly in the 20th and 21st centuries. Legal frameworks in many countries restrict physical punishment in institutions like prisons and schools. Some argue that children subjected to severe physical punishment may be more inclined towards antisocial behavior due to heightened stress and resorting to violent coping mechanisms. The aim of this review is to analyze the historical, ethical, and societal implications of corporal punishment, examining its efficacy in behavior correction and its impact on individuals' well-being